Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough terhadap Teks Prosedur Siswa Kelas VII SMP Swasta Hosana Medan

Authors

  • Maria Yuliana Siallagan Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Dairi Sapta Rindu Simanjuntak Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Asnita Hasibuan Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Evi Rosalinda Br Napitupulu Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas
  • Dina Elfrida Simatupang Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v4i3.4510

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Practice, Norman Fairclough, Procedural Text, Sociocultural Practice, Textual Dimension

Abstract

This study aims to describe the Critical Discourse Analysis of procedural texts written by seventh-grade students at Hosana Private Junior High School Medan based on Norman Fairclough’s three dimensions, namely the textual dimension, discourse practice, and sociocultural practice. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The data sources consisted of 38 procedural texts written by seventh-grade students. The data were collected through documentation and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing, and verification. The results showed that, in the textual dimension, most students were able to organize procedural texts in a logical sequence. The representation in the texts was dominated by daily activities, such as preparing food and drinks and making simple crafts. The relationships reflected the students’ positions as providers of instructions to readers, while their identities were reflected through their personal experiences. In the discourse practice dimension, the texts were mostly produced based on students’ experiences at home and school using simple language. In the sociocultural practice dimension, the texts reflected values of independence, responsibility, discipline, creativity, and cleanliness. However, several weaknesses were still found in spelling, punctuation, word choice, conjunctions, and sentence construction. The implication of this study is that Indonesian language learning should connect students’ daily experiences with systematic writing activities. Teachers are also encouraged to provide more intensive guidance on text structure and language features. Future researchers are expected to conduct similar studies using broader data and research contexts.

References

Ananda, R., & Fitriani, Y. (2022). Analisis wacana kritis model Norman Fairclough pada teks pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(2), 145–156.

Badara, A. (2012). Analisis wacana: Teori, metode, dan penerapannya pada wacana media. Kencana.

Chaer, A. (2014). Linguistik umum. Rineka Cipta.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. LKiS.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078

Fitri, N., & Ramadhan, S. (2021). Analisis teks prosedur siswa berdasarkan struktur dan kaidah kebahasaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 10(1), 67–78.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Keraf, G. (2004). Komposisi: Sebuah pengantar kemahiran berbahasa. Nusa Indah.

Kosasih, E. (2021). Jenis-jenis teks dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMP/MTs. Yrama Widya.

Mahsun. (2019). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan, strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Rajawali Pers.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2018). Penilaian pembelajaran bahasa berbasis kompetensi. BPFE.

Rahardi, R. K. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Erlangga.

Ramadhan, S., Sukma, E., & Indriyani, V. (2019). Language learning and literacy development in Indonesian schools. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 301, 167–171.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Syahroni. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan dan bahasa. Kencana.

Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Pengajaran wacana. Angkasa.

Tarigan, H. G. (2013). Menulis sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Angkasa.

Tarigan, H. G. (2015). Pengajaran analisis kesalahan berbahasa. Angkasa.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

Wodak, R. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235192

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Maria Yuliana Siallagan, Dairi Sapta Rindu Simanjuntak, Asnita Hasibuan, Evi Rosalinda Br Napitupulu, & Dina Elfrida Simatupang. (2026). Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough terhadap Teks Prosedur Siswa Kelas VII SMP Swasta Hosana Medan. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v4i3.4510